중동고 영어 내신 변형 분석

Ciara Kelly at Sheffield University and colleagues recruited 129 hobbyists to look at how the time spent on their hobbies shaped their work life. To begin with, the team measured how serious each participant's hobby~is,asking them to rate their agreement with statements like “I regularly train for this activity”, and also assessed how similar the demands of their job and hobby were. Then, each month for seven months, participants recorded how many hours they had dedicated to their activity, and completed a scale measuring their belief in their ability to effectively do their job, or their “self-efficacy.” The researchers found that when participants spent longer than normal doing their leisure activity, their belief in their ability to perform their job increased. But this was only the case when they had a serious hobby that was dissimilar to their job, or when their hobby was similar to their work but they only did it casually. When their hobby was both serious and similar to their job, then spending more time on it actually decreased their self-efficacy. Why might that be? To maintain a serious hobby, people need to invest significant psychological resources — so if the activity has the same kinds of demands as their work, they may be left exhausted and unable to perform as well at their job. But if their hobby is quite different from their career, it may not interfere in the same way but instead help them develop other knowledge and skills that can boost their confidence at work. in their nob a ~— (b) Self-efficacy indicates an individual's belief in his(her) capacity to execute behaviors necessary to perform his(her) job. (c) Hobbies _that were dissimilar _to_work_but less serious promote self-efficacy when participants spent longer than normal doing their leisure activity. XS (d) Significant psychologica al resources are _required_to_sustain a serious hobby. (e) When leisure activity poses the same_demands_as _people’s work, it will allow them to get their work done successfully.

Some researchers at Sheffield University recruited 129 bbyists to look at how the time spent on their hobbies aped their work life. To begin with, the team measured the riousness of each participant’s hobby, asking them to rate eir agreement with statements like “I regularly train for this tivity,” and also assessed how similar the demands of their > and hobby were. Then, each month for seven months, rticipants recorded how many hours they had dedicated to eir activity, and completed a scale measuring their belief in eir own ability to effectively do their job, or their lf-efficacy.” The researchers found that when participants ent longer than normal doing their leisure activity, their lief in their ability to perform their job increased. But this is only the case when they had a serious hobby that was ssimilar to their job. When their hobby was both serious and nilar to their job, then spending more time on it actually creased their self-efficacy cho: Shinsoo! I heard that you started painting as your new hobby. hinsoo: Yes, Did you remember,the article on the relationship between hobbies and people’ work life? After reading it, I decided to have a hobby to improve self-efficacy. acho: Oh, I see, According to the article, @a hobby may increase _ self-efficacy, people's belief_in their own ability to complete tasks and reach goals. I want to try having a hobby for self-efficacy. What should I do? hinsoo: @) You need to reduce your time for a_ serious hobby in order to enhance confidence at_work. aeho: Oh well then, I will try to play tennis as my new hobby. hinsoo: I think it is not adequate as a hobby for your self-efficacy. It_is because having a serious hobby can boost self-efficacy at work only when the hobby and the job have some of the same features. acho: Oh, you mean @ my self-efficacy might decrease because playing tennis is very similar to doing my job? hinsoo: Yeah, when your hobby is both serious and analogous to your job, dedicating more time to_it can reduce your self-efficacy

A phenomenon in social psychology, the Pratfall Effect states that an individual's perceived attractiveness increases or decreases after he or she makes a mistake — depending on the individual's perceived @ competence. As celebrities are generally considered to be competent individuals, and often even presented as @ flawless in certain aspects, committing © blunders will make one's humanness endearing to others. Basically, those who never make mistakes are perceived as_ being less attractive and “likable” than those who make @ occasional mistakes. Perfection, or the @attribution of that quality to individuals, creates a perceived distance that the general public cannot relate to — making those who never make mistakes perceived as being less attractive or likable. However, this can also have the opposite effect — if a perceived average or less than average competent person makes a mistake, he or she will be attractive and likable to others. Students must demonstrate ® in all subjects. The service here is essentially @ vis @® The accident was the result of a series of She makes @ appearances on television. Energy is the most important © a good manager should possess.